A Special Mortality among Infants at Loughton, in the Epping Rural Sanitary District
Date: 2017-01-02T00:00:00+00:00
Keywords: Powders -- Toxicology -- England -- Loughton (Essex); Infants -- Death -- England -- Loughton (Essex); Infants -- Health and hygiene -- England -- Loughton (Essex); Loughton (Essex; England) -- Social conditions -- 19th century

The Project Gutenberg eBook of A Special Mortality among Infants at Loughton, in the Epping Rural Sanitary District

This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: A Special Mortality among Infants at Loughton, in the Epping Rural Sanitary District

Author: Sir William Henry Power

Release date: January 1, 2017 [eBook #53863]

Language: English

Credits: Transcribed from the 1878 edition by David Price

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A SPECIAL MORTALITY AMONG INFANTS AT LOUGHTON, IN THE EPPING RURAL SANITARY DISTRICT ***

Transcribed from the 1878 edition by David Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org

Mr. W. H. Power’s Report to the Local Government Board
respecting a Special Mortality among Infants at Loughton,
in the Epping Rural Sanitary District.

Edward C. Seaton, M.D.,
Medical Department,
April 15, 1878.

On the 22nd March 1878, complaint was made by Mr. Octavius Deacon, of Golding’s Hill, Loughton, to Mr. Secretary Cross, that a serious attack by skin disease of his own infant had resulted from the use for nursery purposes of violet powder, which on analysis by Mr. G. Jones, F.C.S., had been found to contain in large proportion white arsenic; and further, Mr. Deacon stated his belief that a large and fatal prevalence of skin disease among infants in Loughton had been due to the use in a similar way of violet powder of a like sort.  This representation was referred by Mr. Cross to the Local Government Board.  On 25th March the Board received a communication from the clerk to the Epping Rural Sanitary Authority enclosing a statement by the Medical Officer of Health to the effect that a special mortality among infants in his district, already reported by him, had, he has now reason to believe, resulted from the use of violet powder impregnated with arsenic.  Hereupon the present inquiry was ordered.

I lost no time in putting myself in communication with Mr. Deacon and with the several officers of the Epping Rural Sanitary Authority, and from them received every assistance in carrying out my inquiry.  Especially am I beholden to Mr. Fowler, medical officer of health, who has supplied me with important information respecting the occurrences resulting in the mortality referred to; and to Mr. Bell, inspector of nuisances, who has accompanied and assisted me day by day during my investigations.  To Mr. Lewis district medical officer, and to other medical men practising in Loughton, my acknowledgments are also due.

The result of this inquiry is as follows:—

Since early March 1877, 29 infants and children in Loughton have been attacked by, and 13 have died of, a peculiar affection of the skin, that had been regarded as an anomalous kind of erysipelas.  The disease was described to me by the mothers or others nursing the cases as presenting the following appearances:—

In fatal cases, a generally blackened condition of the skin of the groins and pudenda, which quickly became somewhat swollen and hard; this was frequently the first change observed.  Occasionally there was a like condition of the abdomen about and below the umbilicus.  The skin of the axillæ and folds of the neck was another part in which blackening and swelling was commonly observed.  Invasion of these several parts, when it occurred, was simultaneous.  In some instances vesication, variously described as “little white blisters,” “yellowish bladders” or “bags of water” preceded or appeared about the same time as the blackness; in others, blackness with, or without, vesication was preceded by a short interval by a bluish red condition of the parts affected.  The vesicles breaking discharged clear fluid, and left raw black surfaces, which did not, it would seem, take on suppurative or sloughing action.  In no instance was a tense shining appearance of the skin spoken of; nor was there, except in one case, any tendency of the blackened condition of the surface to extend over the limbs or trunk.  The constitutional symptoms seem to have been great restlessness, with fits of crying or screaming in the first instance, passing soon into a condition apparently of collapse in which the infant quietly died.  The average duration of illness in these cases was four to five days.

In non-fatal cases, the symptoms varied much in severity.  In almost all, blisters or bladders like those already spoken of formed between the folds of the groins, in the armpits, and in the neck.  In some cases these vesications broke and formed black excavated sores, in the neighbourhood of which the skin became more or less indurated and discoloured.  From some of the sores “cores came out,” and all discharged yellowish matter.  In milder cases minute vesicles burst and left shallow sores that were little if at all discoloured, and that quickly healed under appropriate treatment.  The constitutional symptoms do not seem to have been in any instance out of proportion to the local malady.  In few, if indeed in any, cases were vomiting or purging prominent symptoms.

There has now to be considered—What has been the nature of the disease, and how did it come about?  Has it been erysipelas as it was at first thought to be; or, has it been, as recently alleged, skin-poisoning?

I.  As to erysipelas.  From the above account it appears by no means surprising that the malady in its graver cases (many of the slighter ones did not come under medical treatment) should have been regarded as a disease of the nature of erysipelas.  It resembled that disease in several important features, and the constitutional symptoms, particularly of the fatal cases, might well have belonged to erysipelas itself.  On the other hand it may be remarked that the malady in question seems to have differed from erysipelas as ordinarily observed in certain not unimportant particulars.  There was not, so far as I can ascertain, any of that marked, tense, glistening or shining appearance of the skin, almost invariably present in erysipelas of infants; moreover, the affection had commonly no tendency to wander over the trunk and limbs in the manner customary with such erysipelas; but instead remained localised almost from the first, in each instance, in the parts of the body primarily affected by it.  This appears to have been specially notable as regards those slighter cases not medically treated; in such the vesication and subsequent abrasion and induration of the skin was observed only in the folds of the neck, armpits, and genital organs.  Nevertheless, before discarding the hypothesis of erysipelas, I thought it well to inquire whether there had been any typical erysipelas among infants or others in the parish; and whether the facts of the distribution of the malady in question could be explained on the supposition that those attacked had had conveyed to them erysipelatous infection.  In this sense inquiry has result as follows:—

(1.)  As to typical erysipelas.  Except two cases, occurring in adults, one in October the other in December 1877 (both it will be observed long after the earlier cases of the infantile malady), I cannot hear of any occurrence whatever in Loughton of ordinary erysipelas in persons of any age.  Vaccination proceeded as usual and no erysipelas or other disease was observed in connexion with it.

(2.)  As to likely channels for erysipelas propagation, one kind only seems of importance as being in any degree probable, viz., the baby linen clubs of the parish.  These, the church club and the chapel club, have been instituted for the purpose of affording their subscribers body and baby linen during the month subsequent to confinement.  One rule common to both clubs provides that clothing thus acquired shall be returned properly cleansed and got up within five weeks from the date of loan; and hence it might have happened that, assuming the disease to have been erysipelas, babies’ napkins imbued with specific contagion might have been returned to the club imperfectly cleansed or not properly disinfected, and have thus, on reissue, conveyed to other infants the infection of that disease.  Examination of the operations of these two clubs shows that during the last 15 months there have been ten boxes or bags of baby linen in circulation, and that of the 29 sufferers by the malady 17 have received club linen, while 12 have not.  On the other hand 33 other infants have during the same period had baby linen from one or other of the clubs without ill result.  The 17 sufferers, with 19 others, were all of them members of the church club, the total operations of which during the period referred to are shown in detail in Table I.

Table I.

Box.

Order
of
Issue.

Date of Issue.

Infant attacked.

Date of Return
of Box.

Order
of
Return.

C. C. [7]

1

5

10

33

13 Jan. 1877

20 Feb. „

14 May „

11 March 1878

Mid. March 1877

No

No

No

18 Feb. 1877

26 March „

18 June „

—

1

4

10

—

C.G.H. [2]

2

21

29

20 Jan. 1877

26 Oct. „

14 Feb. 1878

4 March 1877

26 Oct. „

14 Feb. 1878

26 Feb. 1877

12 Nov. „

18 Feb. 1878

2

21

27

S.P. [1]

3

9

12

14

34

14 Feb. 1877

5 April „

4 June „

30 June „

14 March 1878

2 March 1877

No

5 June 1877

1 July „

15 March 1878

23 March 1877

14 May „

21 June „

6 Aug. „

3

9

11

14

C.G.H. [1]

6

11

18

23

27

30

35

21 Feb. 1877

28 May „

27 Aug. „

26 Nov. „

Jan. 1878 ,,

18 Feb. „

29 March „

Early March 1877

No

No

1 Jan. 1878

14 Feb. „

Mid. March 1878

No

27 March 1877

12 July „

1 Oct. „

1 Jan. 1878

—

20 March 1878

—

6

13

18

24

25

30

—

G.P. [1]

7

15

17

19

22

26

32

22 Feb. 1877

2 July „

16 Aug. „

26 Sept. „

23 Nov. „

14 Jan. 1878

7 March „

No

2 July 1877

16 Aug. „

No

15 Nov. 1877

No

No

26 March 1877

6 Aug. „

20 Sept. „

5 Nov. „

17 Dec. „

18 Feb. 1878

—

5

15

17

19

22

28

—

S.P. [2]

4

8

13

24

25

28

36

19 Feb. 1877

28 March „

4 June „

28 Nov. „

31 Dec. „

13 Feb. 1878

30 March „

No

No

No

22 Nov. 1877

No

No

No

26 March 1877

4 May „

9 July „

17 Dec. „

4 Feb. 1878

18 March ,,

—

7

8

12

23

26

29

—

G.P. [2]

16

20

31

3 July 1877

27 Sept. „

18 Feb. 1878

No

No

19 Feb. 1878

9 Aug. 1877

5 Nov. „

25 March 1878

16

20

31

The facts to be learned from the above table are not upon the whole suggestive of relation between the operations of the club and the attack of sufferers by the malady, and for the following reasons:—The four first sufferers, attacked almost simultaneously in March 1877, received each of them a separate box from the club, and in one instance only out of the four was the next reissue of the box associated with attack of the infant receiving it.  Further, the interval between the issue of the box and attack of the infant, in families invaded by the disease, varied very oddly, and in a way too not easily reconcilable with such incubation period as might have been anticipated of erysipelas under circumstances of conveyed infection.  In 8, including the four first sufferers, it varied from two to four or more weeks; in 7 it was nil or one day only; while in two the infant was attacked before receipt of the box.  Examination of the same sort as regards the movements of monthly nurses gave similarly negative evidence.  Apparently the disease, whatever may have been its origin, has not been carried from case to case by means such as might have conveyed erysipelatous or allied infection.

II.  As to skin-poisoning.  The malady from which the 29 infants have suffered has now to be dealt with in its relation to the particular violet powder that has been alleged to have been the cause of it.  This powder had, in every instance that I myself investigated, been bought from one or other of two grocer’s shops situated, the one in the High Road, the other at Baldwin’s Hill, Loughton.  From inquiries by Mr. Bell, inspector of nuisances, it would appear that of many shops in Loughton selling violet powder, these two, and these only, obtained such powder from a certain dealer in the East of London referred to by name by the medical officer of health in his statement already mentioned.  Mr. Bell further ascertained that in Loughton this particular powder was sold by the retail tradesmen in small penny packets or boxes each of which bore the name and address of the wholesale dealer in question.  The facts of the connexion between the powder thus sold in Loughton and the prevalence of disease are as follows:—

1.  Of the 29 sufferers, 27 had the particular powder in use at or about the date of attack.  Of the remaining two, the mother of one had the particular powder in the house at the time the infant was attacked, but did not, so far as she can remember, use it; the other mother (whose infant suffered very slightly) had no powder at all, and is of opinion that the soreness of her infant’s neck was the result of pressure from the instruments used in delivery.

2.  The sufferers with few exceptions (all of whom however had the powder) were grouped near to one or other of the two shops which alone in this extensive parish sold the particular powder in question.

3.  Infants using the particular powder, and those alone, were attacked by the malady.  This is shown in the following table, which is an abstract of the results of personal inquiry to this end respecting infants born in the parish during the half year ended March 1878.  Except where otherwise stated, violet powder of some sort was used to every child, and (with certain exceptions to be considered in the text) only one kind of powder was in use to the several children attacked by the malady.

Table II.

Locality.

Date of
Birth.

Date of
Attack.

Violet Powder
from one or
other of the two Shops.

Remarks.

Forest Road

2 Oct. 1877

No

No

?  Any powder.

Loughton Park

4 Oct. „

No

No

High Road

5 Oct. „

No

No

Baldwin’s Hill

6 Oct. „

25 Oct.

Yes

Epping New Road

15 Oct. „

No

No

Forest Road

18 Oct. „

No

—

Born in a tent by roadside.

Forest Road

21 Oct. „

No

No

Ash Green

25 Oct. „

26 Oct.

Yes

Forest Road

26 Oct. „

No

No

?  Any powder.

High Road

1 Nov. „

No

No

High Road

7 Nov. „

31 Dec.

Yes

Smart’s Lane

8 Nov. „

No

No

Baldwin’s Hill

11 Nov. „

15 Nov.

Yes

High Road

14 Nov. „

No

No

Forest Road

18 Nov. „

No

No

Only lived 15 minutes.

Ash Green

20 Nov. ,,

22 Nov.

Yes

Smart’s Lane

20 Nov. „

No

No

England’s Lane

27 Nov. „

1 Jan. 1878

Yes

Habitually used starch.

Smart’s Lane

30 Nov. „

No

—

Left district.

Loughton Road

16 Dec. „

No

No

Warren Hill

24 Dec. „

No

No

Smart’s Lane

24 Dec. „

No

No

Baldwin’s Hill

29 Dec. „

30 Dec.

Yes

Ash Green

30 Dec. „

14 Feb.

Yes

At first used powder from previous confinement.

Mutton Row

30 Dec. „

No

No

Golding’s Hill

2 Jan. 1878

20 Feb.

Yes

Trap’s Hill

3 Jan. „

No

No

York Hill

5 Jan. „

No

No

Forest Road

19 Jan. „

No

No

Forest Road

30 Jan. „

No

No

Smart’s Lane

5 Feb. „

No

No

Warren

8 Feb. „

No

No

Baldwin’s Hill

10 Feb. „

14 Feb.

Yes

Forest Road

12 Feb. „

No

No

York Hill

17 Feb. „

19 Feb.

Yes

Baldwin’s Hill

19 Feb. „

Mid. March

Yes

High Road

1 March „

No

No

High Road

11 March ,,

No

No

Golding’s Hill

13 March „

15 March

Yes

4.  Further and detailed evidence confirmatory in a high degree of relation in the sense of effect to cause between the malady of infants and the use of the particular powder, could, were it necessary, be given in regard of most, if not all, of the cases attacked by the disease.  But the following will suffice.  They are also explanatory of the interval between birth and attack observed in certain cases recorded in the above and in the previous table.

E. W., born 6th October 1877; attacked 25th October.  Mother states that for the first fortnight from birth she used for dusting the infant violet powder purchased at a distance.  This being expended, she obtained a packet of the particular powder from one of the two shops in the parish selling it.  A day or two after using this fresh powder she noticed redness, blackness, and swelling of the privates and neck of the infant; in three more days it died.  C. N., born 7th November 1877; attacked 31st December.  Mother from infant’s birth used for dusting it violet powder from a chemist near at home, and perhaps some also from a friend.  On 29th December she attended her daughter in confinement and took with her her own infant.  Here she used for both infants powder from one of the two shops referred to.  On 30th December her daughter’s, and on 31st December her own, infant was attacked.  Daughter’s infant died January 1st; her own recovered, but is much scarred.  P. S., born 30th December; attacked February 14.  From birth until about February 11th the mother used violet powder remaining in the house since her last confinement; she also used starch.  About the last-mentioned date she obtained some of the particular powder, and after using it perhaps three days noticed pimples on the groins, under the scrotum, under the arms, and at both sides of the neck.  The pimples soon turned black, and became deep holes discharging much yellow matter.  Used the powder a few days only; “did not like it;” “it was yellow;” burned it.  Child recovered.  E. D., born 2nd January; attacked about 20th February.  The mother used starch powder from infant’s birth until two days before it fell ill, when, having no starch powder, she procured a packet of the particular violet powder.  This was used two days only, but the infant suffered in the same way as P. S.  It recovered, but is scarred.  H. J., born 19th February 1878; attacked middle March.  The mother at and after infant’s birth used violet powder received as a present from London.  The day before the infant was attacked she commenced using some of the particular powder recently purchased.  The groins only were affected in this case; they became black and broke into sores.  The use of the powder was discontinued as soon as the infant fell ill.  On one occasion, however, it was used to a sister aged two years and four months; she suffered in like manner.  Both children recovered.  A. W., born 26th May 1877; attacked 9th June.  The mother states that until the infant was 11 days old she had no powder at all.  About 5th June she purchased a packet of the particular powder and used it to the infant in the ordinary way.  On 9th June she noticed that the privates were swelled, and that white bladders as big as a hazel nut had formed thereon, as well as under the arms and around the neck.  These changed colour and broke into deep wounds which discharged yellow matter.  Cores came out from the sores under the arms.  The use of the powder was discontinued after six days, and in about two months the infant was fairly well.  Hereupon the mother recommenced the use of the particular powder, and the same night the infant was very restless and screamed a great deal.  Next morning “the bladders were out again;” the powder was then burned.  The child eventually recovered, but is deeply scarred about the scrotum, groins, neck, and armpits, as if by sloughing of the soft parts hereabouts.  F. W., born 20th February 1877; attacked early in March.  From birth the mother used violet powder from a chemist near at hand, but when the infant was about a fortnight old she bought, and used to the lower parts of its body only, a packet of the particular powder.  Next day the infant broke out into sores about the navel and pudenda.  The use of the particular powder was at once discontinued and the infant shortly got well.  Some months later the mother being out of violet powder, again used the particular powder to the infant, and at once the sores reappeared.  The powder was then burned.  A. D., aged three years, was attacked about Christmas 1877 by varicella.  During recovery and while the pocks were dying away, she herself purchased a packet of the particular powder, which was then used for dusting the eruption about the pudenda.  Almost at once the dying vesicles became sores which turned black and discharged matter; on healing they left scars.  It is stated that in this instance the powder was used on one occasion only.  T. C., born 15th August 1877.  36 hours after birth pimples and bladders formed about the privates and navel, which parts swelled, turned black, and became hard; no sores.  Infant died 21st August.  The particular powder was used in this instance from birth.  Three months afterwards some of the remainder of this powder was used for dusting sores on the head, face, and arms of a sister aged four years who had recently suffered from measles.  These sores became much worse and inflamed; those on the arms have left large scars.

Incidentally it is here shown that those parts only of infants bodies to which toilet powder is ordinarily applied have been affected by the malady; and further that such application of the particular powder has been constantly followed in very few days by the symptoms complained of.  Additional evidence respecting the shortness of the interval between application of the particular powder and the appearance of the symptoms attributed to it, is afforded by the fact of 16 infants to whom this powder was applied from birth onwards no less than 10 were attacked in from one to four days.  Nor is the conclusion, irresistible from the foregoing evidence, in any way weakened by the six instances in which the attack was not immediate; for there must have been a beginning to the mischievous quality of the powder bought at the shops of the vendors of the particular powder.  These six cases were at the very commencement of the total series.  All of them, and they were of various ages, from two to 20 weeks, fell ill at the same time, viz., early in March 1877.  And though all of them it would appear had used more than one packet of violet powder from one or other of the two shops in question between birth and the commencement of illness, in more than one instance a fresh packet of powder is remembered to have been procured a day or two before attack.  So far from weakening, these exceptions strengthen the conclusion; more than that, they seem to indicate that not until the end of February or early March of last year did violet powder bought at these two shops in Loughton possess hurtful properties.

Probably enough has been made out to satisfy any reasonable doubt that may have been entertained as to the connexion between the use in Loughton of the particular violet powder and the lamentable effects attributed to it.  It will be observed that the evidence is absolutely independent of the nature of the irritating agent in the powder.  Whether or not that agent may have been arsenic, as found by Mr. Jones in the specimens submitted to him by Mr. Deacon, matters nothing to the proof I have given of this connexion.  But I have submitted to Dr. Dupré for analysis samples of the violet powder which I obtained from the mothers of three of the sufferers from the malady, and when Dr. Dupré’s report is received I shall append it.  Meanwhile I annex a tabulated statement of the cases investigated.

W. H. POWER.

9 April 1878.

Report on three samples of Violet Powder received from Mr. W. H. Power, April 4, 1878.

All the powders were of a very pale yellowish colour, and rather more gritty to the touch than ordinary violet powder; they were also appreciably heavier, bulk for bulk.  Taking the weight of a given bulk of ordinary violet powder as 1, the same bulk of these powders would weigh about 1.25.  Under the microscope they are shown to consist of potatoe starch mixed with a very considerable proportion of crystalline matter, among which regular octahedra (arsenious acid) can be distinguished.  On burning they evolve a very powerful arsenical odour.

Chemical analysis showed them to consist in 100 parts of

A

B

C

Starch with traces of other organic matter

37.58

34.56

36.76

Arsenious acid (white arsenic)

50.34

51.40

48.94

Oxide of lead [6]

1.07

1.16

0.83

Other mineral matters chiefly carbonate of magnesia

11.01

12.88

13.47

100.00

100.00

100.00

A. Dupré.

Westminster Hospital, April 13, 1878.

29 cases dealt with in Mr. W. H. Power’s Report respecting a Special Mortality among Infants in Loughton Parish.

Locality in Loughton.

Date of Birth.

Date of Attack.

Result.

Remarks as to use of the particular Powder.

Reference to in Report, under

Table
I.

Table
II.

Detailed
evidence.

1

Golding’s Hill

14 Feb. 1877

2 March 1877

Died 7 March 1877.

Powder from one of the vendors of the particular powder used from birth onwards.

No. 8

—

—

2

Baldwin’s Hill

7 Dec. 1876

4 March „

Died 6 March 1877.

Powder from one of the vendors of the particular powder used from birth onwards.  Had four packets.

—

—

—

3

Baldwin’s Hill

20 Jan. 1877

4 March „

Died 8 March 1877.

Powder from one of the vendors of the particular powder used from birth onwards.

,, 5

—

—

4

Baldwin’s Hill

17 Oct. 1876

Early March 1877

Recovered

Powder from one of the vendors of the particular powder used from birth onwards, fresh packet just before attack.

—

—

—

5

Baldwin’s Hill

20 Jan. 1877

7 March 1877

Recovered

Powder from one of the vendors of the particular powder used from birth onwards till attack, probably fresh packet just before attack.

—

—

—

6

Golding’s Hill

12 Jan. „

Mid.  March 1877

Recovered

Powder from one of the vendors of the particular powder used from birth onwards till attack, probably fresh packet about time of attack.

,, 1

—

—

7

Ash Green

20 Feb. „

Early March 1877

Recovered

Other powder till day before attack, then particular powder.

„ 13

—

F. W., page 5.

8

High Road

4 June ,,

5 June 1877

Died 8 June 1877

The particular powder used from birth.

„ 10

—

—

9

Pump Hill

26 May „

9 June „

Recovered

The particular powder on and after 11th day from birth.  Was twice attacked.

—

—

A. W., page 5.

10

Baldwin’s Hill

29 June „

1 July „

Recovered

No powder of any kind.  Thought by mother to have had local injury at delivery.

,, 11

—

(doubtful case)

11

Baldwin’s Hill

30 June „

2 July „

Died 7 July 1877

The particular powder used from birth to attack.

,, 21

—

—

12

Baldwin’s Hill

— 1875

Aug. „

Recovered

The particular powder exceptionally used to a chafed thigh.

—

—

—

13

Stoney Path

15 Aug. 1877

16 Aug. „

Died 21 Aug. 1877

The particular powder used from birth till death.

,, 22

—

T. C., page 5.

14

Baldwin’s Hill

6 Oct. „

25 Oct. „

Died 28 Oct. 1877

Other powder till day or so before attack, then particular powder.

—

No. 4

E. W., page 4.

15

Ash Green

25 Oct. „

26 Oct. „

Died 30 Oct. 1877

The particular powder used from birth onwards.

,, 6

,, 8

—

16

Baldwin’s Hill

11 Nov. „

15 Nov. „

Recovered

The particular powder used till attack, then discontinued.

,, 24

„ 13

—

17

Ash Green

20 Nov. „

22 Nov. „

Died 30 Nov. 1877

The particular powder used from birth till death.

„ 30

„ 16

—

18

Stoney Path

— 1873

— Nov. „

Recovered

The particular powder exceptionally used to sores following measles.

—

—

Sister to T. C., page 5.

19

Golding’s Hill

— 1875

Xmas „

Recovered

The particular powder exceptionally used to sores from chicken pox.

—

—

A. D., page 5.

20

Baldwin’s Hill

29 Dec. 1877

30 Dec. „

Died 1 Jan. 1878

The particular powder used from birth till death.

—

„ 23

Infant of N.’s daughter, page 4.

21

High Road

7 Nov. „

31 Dec. „

Recovered

Other powder till 29 Dec., particular powder at and after that date.

—

„ 11

C. N., page 4.

22

England’s Lane

26 Nov. „

1 Jan. 1878

Recovered

Starch only thought to have been used; but particular powder kept in house.

„ 16

„ 18

—

23

Ash Green

30 Dec. „

14 Feb. „

Recovered

Powder remaining from previous confinement till few days before attack, then particular powder.

,, 17

,, 24

P. S., page 5.

24

Baldwin’s Hill

13 Feb. 1878

14 Feb. „

Died 18 Feb. 1878.

The particular powder used from birth till death.

,, 7

„ 33

—

25

Golding’s Hill

2 Jan. „

20 Feb. „

Recovered

Other powder used till two days before attack, then, for two days, particular powder.

—

„ 26

E. D., page 5.

26

Golding’s Hill

13 March „

15 March 1878.

Died 19 March 1878.

The particular powder from birth till illness.

,, 12

„ 39

—

27

Baldwin’s Cottage.

— Dec. 1875

Mid.  March 1878.

Recovered

The particular powder exceptionally used a day or so before attack.

—

—

Sister to H. J., page 5.

28

Baldwin’s Cottage.

19 Feb. 1878

Mid.  March 1878.

Recovered

Powder from London till day before attack, then particular powder.

„ 18

„ 36

H.  J., page 5.

29

York Hill.

17 Feb. „

19 Feb. 1878

Died 22 Feb. 1878.

The particular powder from birth.

,, 36

„ 35

—

Note.—Nos. 3 and 4, 13 and 18, 4 and 12, and 27 and 18 occurred, in each instance, in the same household.

LONDON:
Primed by George E. Eyre and William Spottiswoode,
Printers to the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty.
For Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
[B 580.—100.—10/78.]

Footnotes.

[6]  The exact combination in which the oxide of lead occurs has not been determined, whether as carbonate or combined with the arsenious acid or in some other form.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A SPECIAL MORTALITY AMONG INFANTS AT LOUGHTON, IN THE EPPING RURAL SANITARY DISTRICT ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

- • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

- • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

- • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

- • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Table of Contents

- Mr. W. H. Power’s Report to the Local Government Board respecting a Special Mortality among Infants at Loughton, in the Epping Rural Sanitary District.

- Report on three samples of Violet Powder received from Mr. W. H. Power, April 4, 1878.

- 29 cases dealt with in Mr. W. H. Power’s Report respecting a Special Mortality among Infants in Loughton Parish.

- Footnotes.

- THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE